The governing regulation, AR 15-80, permits the government to revisit a grade determination “[i]f substantial new evidence discovered contemporaneously with or within a short time following separation could result in a lower grade determination.” Here is what the regulation actually says (¶ 4-1):
c. Officer grade determinations are normally accomplished at time of retirement or disability separation, and the officer’s grade is fixed at that time. A grade determination can be reopened by the Army after separation—
(1) If the separation and/or accompanying grade determination was procured by fraud.
(2) If substantial new evidence discovered contemporaneously with or within a short time following separation could result in a lower grade determination. For example, if an officer’s misconduct while still on active duty is documented by memorandum of reprimand, nonjudicial punishment, or conviction after retirement, and such misconduct was not discoverable through due diligence, a new grade determination may be completed.
(3) If a mistake of law or mathematical miscalculation led to an improper separation or grade determination.Is it plausible to treat the years that have elapsed since Gen. Petraeus retired (in 2011) as "a short time"? (Comments are welcome on this issue, but, as always, please use your real name when commenting.)
Nancy A. Youssef and Shane Harris have also written about the controversy in The Daily Beast here.
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to moderation and must be submitted under your real name. Anonymous comments will not be posted (even though the form seems to permit them).