here in Dawn:
Military courts here . . . can be justified under international law, but only if they are solely employed to try the Taliban for war crimes during an internal conflict. Many scholars argue that during conflict, military judges are more qualified to try war crimes than civilian judges, as they are better able to assess guilt and innocence in the special context of a war.
But the Taliban should be tried as civilians and not as combatants for perpet[r]ating war crimes. While such categorisation is insignificant with regard to the Peshawar attack, because civilians were made the object of attack, classifying the Taliban as combatants risks according them combatant immunity, which can prevent prosecution for lawful acts of war, such as targeting Pakistani armed forces while actively engaged in hostilities.
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to moderation and must be submitted under your real name. Anonymous comments will not be posted (even though the form seems to permit them).