Note to self: how does command-centric disposition authority of a service-academy superintendent function in this case of wrongful appropriation of a mascot (is the Supe an accuser, and if so, which type?) -- or is it one of abusing a public animal? But wait, is a goat a public animal?
Comments particularly welcome. Real names, please.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to moderation and must be submitted under your real name. Anonymous comments will not be posted (even though the form seems to permit them).