"It is not an overstatement to say
that we are in the midst of a military justice revolution.
In any examination of military
justice with an eye towards reform, there is the notion that the traditional
military justice system no longer works well. This notion stems from the belief
that this system needs a reformation in order to be in line with society’s
broader understanding of what constitutes a fair system of justice. Minor
modifications or a tweaking of the system is not sufficient.
To bring military justice into
the modern age, many reformers have called for major overhauls and fundamental
structural changes to the military justice system as a whole. These calls for
reform have been particularly prevalent in countries with a common law
tradition. In the past several years many countries, including the United
Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, have each undertaken significant
reforms within their respective military justice systems.
If there is one overarching theme
to these reforms, it is a clear trend towards “civilianizing military justice.”
By that I mean reforming military justice so that it mirrors the civilian
justice system in that particular country to a much greater degree. There are a
number of influences driving this reform. The most important of these
influences come from the human rights community and from those who believe that
a division of authority is essential in order for any judicial system to be
considered fair."
Victor Hansen, The Impact Of Military
Justice Reforms On The Law Of Armed Conflicts: How To Avoid Unintended
Consequences. Michigan State International Law Review, Vol 21:2 (2013) at 230.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to moderation and must be submitted under your real name. Anonymous comments will not be posted (even though the form seems to permit them).