The Constitutional Court of South Korea yesterday recognized a right to conscientious objection, departing from two earlier decisions. The New York Times has a good report on the decision and its political and legal context. The government must provide alternate forms of national service. The ruling is not yet on the court's English-language website.
A check of the court's decisions, however, yields another interesting decision from 2016, concerning whether a riot-police constable can be detained in the guardhouse in disciplinary proceedings. Regrettably, the posted version is unclear since it seems to indicate that a 4-justice opinion was the majority, prevailing over a 5-justice dissent. Help!
A check of the court's decisions, however, yields another interesting decision from 2016, concerning whether a riot-police constable can be detained in the guardhouse in disciplinary proceedings. Regrettably, the posted version is unclear since it seems to indicate that a 4-justice opinion was the majority, prevailing over a 5-justice dissent. Help!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to moderation and must be submitted under your real name. Anonymous comments will not be posted (even though the form seems to permit them).