It’s a concern that if he did know about it, and he still wrote that kind of recommendation, then it’s another example of the failure to take things seriously” in Canada’s military when it comes to allegations of sexual misconduct.
This writer challenged this unfair criticism. My comments are below. First, for a bit of a background on MGen Fortin
BACKGROUND
MGen
Fortin is a 30-year veteran. He recently led NATO’s Training Mission in Iraq
and previously led Canadian soldiers in Afghanistan. He also previously served on
a two-year assignment (2015-2017) as the Deputy Commanding General of I Corps
DCG-0 at the Joint Base Lewis-McChord stationed in the State of Washington. A rising star!
On May 14, 2021, MGen Fortin was suddenly removed from the performance of his military duty with the PHAC, on the orders of his political masters: the Minister of National Defence and the Minister of Health pending the results of a military police investigation.
MGen Fortin first learned of the specific of the allegations against him only on May 16, 2021. This information was provided by a news reporter. This took him completely by surprise. Hevigorously and categorically denies the allegations.
According to the same news media sources, the incident being investigated dates back to 1989 when Fortin would allegedly have exposed himself to a woman while he was a student at the Royal Military College at St-Jean-sur-le-Richelieu, Quebec. The identify of the complainant has not been made public.
On May 19, the military police referred the matter to the Province of Quebec’s Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions for review. and possible prosecution before a civil court (presumably because on the date of the alleged offence, the Canadian military did NOT have jurisdiction to prosecute 'sexual assault'.
On June 14, 2021, MGen Fortin filed and Application
for Judicial Review before the Federal Court of Canada asking that
the decision to remove him from his military duties with the PHAC be judicially
reviewed. In his application, he pleaded that the decision to remove him was
made for a political purpose and that he was denied procedural fairness.
The decision was arbitrary, not in the public interest and made
solely for the personal and political gain of the Ministers of Health and National
Defence and the Prime Minister.
Since
the termination of his secondment to PCAC, MGen Fortin has been without assignment and
has been relieved from the performance of a military duty.
MY COMMENTS: POLITICAL INTERFERENCE GALORE
The
National Post article published today cites this writer as follows:
- Operating under the accepted constitutional principle that one is assumed to be innocent until proven guilty by a court of law, it makes a lot of good sense for the acting CDS, LGen Wayne Eyre to have assessed MGen Fortin’s previous year on-job performance to his true and well-earned value.
- To do otherwise, would mean that LGen Eyre would have acted, at that moment, as judge and jury in the affair. The CDS acted most properly by giving due recognition to Maj Gen Fortin’s potential for further advancement and letting justice run its course. To have acted any other way would have been improper, unjust, unfair and contrary to procedural fairness.”
- It clearly was the politicians not the military command that decided on MGen Fortin’s future. And this is most preoccupying. We have sacrificed the career of an otherwise outstanding military officer to satisfy the perceived political interests of the moment. It is Canada’s loss
CONCLUSION
As acting CDS, LGen Eyre is currently lacking in power, stature and authority to face, contest and resist political interference with his onerous responsibilities while facing one of worst possible crisis ever facing the Canadian military. .
This is most troublesome and concerning.
Under current climate at National Defence Headquarters (Pentagon North), the acting CDS’s power, authority and influence is therefore considerably reduced.
From all accounts, Maj Gen Fortin is being sacrificed on the altar of political expediency. That is too bad for him, the armed forces and Canada.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to moderation and must be submitted under your real name. Anonymous comments will not be posted (even though the form seems to permit them).