The change in the upper chamber to the Armed Forces Bill means service personnel alleged to have committed in the UK the most severe crimes, such as murder, rape and child abuse, would be dealt with in the civilian courts rather than a court martial, unless authorized by the Attorney General on grounds of complexity.
So reports Merco Press. Armed Forces Net has similar reporting.
This does not actually bind the House of Commons, which is a democratically elected chamber (the House of Lords is not). I may be wrong but, after the scrutiny given to the proposals by the Armed Forces Defence Select Committee, it is doubtful anything significant will change.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the clarification.
ReplyDeleteCan anyone provide a breakdown of coutries that now rely on civilian tribunals to tried members of the armed forces accused of serious crimes committed within national territorial boundaries in peacetime?
ReplyDeleteAustria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Japan and Sweden.
ReplyDelete