The thing about chicken

When you mention chicken to military justice mavens, what might come to mind? In the U.S., the Sanchez case, perhaps ("Is the chicken admissible?"); in Australia, the "rubber chicken" case. But in South Korea, now, it has to be the government's effort to require closure of a chicken restaurant because the owner has not reported for duty as a conscript, even though he is currently litigating whether he has a constitutional right to exemption as a conscientious objector. Looks like over-reach, so no wonder the National Human Rights Commission is on the case.

According to this report, "Article 76 of the Military Service Act . . .  bars the state, local governments and employers from appointing or employing people avoiding conscription or mobilization, and requires the cancellation of associated permits, approvals, licenses and registrations."