As an aside, the US Uniform Code of Military Justice, 64 Stat. 109, 10 U.S.C. sub-chapter XKK, article 142 (b) (2)(B)(4) stipulates that: “A person may not be appointed as a judge of the court within seven years after retirement from active duty as a commissioned officer of a regular component of an armed force” to the US Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. This is to ensure that the Court be, and be perceived, as ‘an independent civilian court unencumbered by ties to any of the military services”. Regrettably, in Canada no such restriction exists and, therefore, the situation may be perceived as being inconsistent with the role of the CMAC as a civilian tribunal.
Friday, July 28, 2017
Each to their own!
As an aside, the US Uniform Code of Military Justice, 64 Stat. 109, 10 U.S.C. sub-chapter XKK, article 142 (b) (2)(B)(4) stipulates that: “A person may not be appointed as a judge of the court within seven years after retirement from active duty as a commissioned officer of a regular component of an armed force” to the US Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. This is to ensure that the Court be, and be perceived, as ‘an independent civilian court unencumbered by ties to any of the military services”. Regrettably, in Canada no such restriction exists and, therefore, the situation may be perceived as being inconsistent with the role of the CMAC as a civilian tribunal.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to moderation and must be submitted under your real name. Anonymous comments will not be posted (even though the form seems to permit them).