|
Chief Judge James E. Baker |
In an interesting decision, a 3-2 majority of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces has dismissed a petition for discretionary review on the ground that the accused had not personally authorized the filing of the petition. Of particular note in
United States v. Moss, 73 M.J. ___ (C.A.A.F. 2014), is Chief Judge
James E. Baker's recognition of the tension between allowing trials in absentia but not appeals in absentia. He commented (at p. 8) that "trials in absentia are the sort of trials that undermine the credibility of foreign military justice systems." Senior Judge
Andrew S. Effron joined in the dissent.
Does
your system permit courts-martial in absentia? Can there be an appeal if the appellant is a fugitive? Must the appellant have personally authorized the appeal?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to moderation and must be submitted under your real name. Anonymous comments will not be posted (even though the form seems to permit them).