President Yoweri Museveni of Uganda has posted an explanation for his country's continued improper use of military courts to try civilians. As explained here, it doesn't wash:
President Museveni’s stance on trying civilians in the General Court Martial (GCM) raises significant legal, ethical, and practical questions.
While he justifies this practice as a means to address case backlogs in civilian courts and ensure swift justice in gun-related offenses, the implications for the Judiciary and adherence to the rule of law remain contentious.
Mr Museveni argues that the GCM is critical for the stability of the country, particularly in regions like Karamoja, by swiftly addressing gun-related crimes. He describes the military courts as a "reinforcement" to civilian courts, especially where these courts are perceived to be overwhelmed by backlogs.
He emphasizes that individuals who acquire firearms with malicious intent should not benefit from the "slow" processes of civilian courts. The GCM, according to Museveni, is better equipped to handle these cases expeditiously, ensuring public safety and deterrence.
Mr Museveni highlights the role of military courts in regions like Karamoja, claiming they have reduced violence and restored order. He cites the detainment of armed youth as an example of the GCM’s effectiveness in removing dangerous individuals from society.
To mitigate concerns about judicial overreach, the President notes that superior courts have the power to rectify errors made by military courts.
Why not just fix the civilian courts so the backlog is eliminated?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to moderation and must be submitted under your real name. Anonymous comments will not be posted (even though the form seems to permit them).