I haven't posted in a while -- life keeps getting in the, particularly now that I'm in a part time grad program, plus work, husbanding, parenting, etc. But in order to get back on track, and energized by Gene's zoom call yesterday, I wanted to republish a piece here from Task and Purpose.
The discussion from a couple other fora have suggested I'm a Trump apologist. Nothing could be further from the truth. What I'm setting out is the proposition that 45, as POTUS, has certain constitutional authorities, that when he gives a public direction, no matter the forum, the military has a duty to understand that direction from the CINC as an order and, barring manifest illegality, to execute it, or at least to clarify it. I keep hearing "that's not how orders work" -- and that's true, usually. But it doesn't HAVE to work that way, as a matter of the President's Article II CINC power. The order is complete the moment issued.
I left unspoken the obvious conclusion that this interpretation *should* serve as a warning to the President to be circumspect with his Tweets, because there are a million men and women under arms duty bound to carry out his orders. This is why Presidents in the past have been very deliberate and disciplined with their communications -- to ensure the messages they desire to be communicated are communicated, with less potential for miscommunication or misinterpretation.
Here's the piece: https://taskandpurpose.com/opinion/trump-tweets-military-orders
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are subject to moderation and must be submitted under your real name. Anonymous comments will not be posted (even though the form seems to permit them).