![]() |
Thursday, October 23, 2014
Vienna memorial to victims of Nazi military justice
Top UCMJ court holds hearing at Camp Lejeune
![]() |
| Photo by Cpl. Michael Oxton, USMC |
Why is the U.S. Coast Guard investigating these cases?
Two petty officers from USCGC Liberty are under Coast Guard investigation following state charges that they failed to salvage game meat as required by Alaska law. They had illegally dumped a deer and four ducks. According to this article:
Editor's query: Why can't the service leave these matters to local law enforcement? Ditto for this Coast Guard case of assault on civilians and being drunk and disorderly outside a bar in Key West? There the accused, who was acquitted of abusive sexual conduct, was sentenced to 30 days restriction and hard labor without confinement. Would a civilian court have been more lenient? Does it matter?
Alaska Department of Fish and Game hunting regulations and state statutes requires that all edible game meat be salvaged and taken to a place to be processed for human consumption. Failure to salvage game meat is a class ‘A’ misdemeanor which can be punishable by up to a year in jail and a $10,000 fine.
* * *
The Coast Guard is investigating the incident to determine whether disciplinary action should be taken against the two men, Coast Guard District 17 spokesman Chief Petty Officer Kip Wadlow said. Any action will be taken after the criminal court case is complete, he said.
“That can depend on the investigation,” he said, describing the range of possible repercussions by the military. “It could be anything just from administrative discipline to potentially something more severe under the (Uniform Code of Military Justice), depending on what the results of the investigation are.”The Coast Guard is also investigating an officer who was cited by the state for illegally shooting a bear that was rummaging in trash in his yard.
Editor's query: Why can't the service leave these matters to local law enforcement? Ditto for this Coast Guard case of assault on civilians and being drunk and disorderly outside a bar in Key West? There the accused, who was acquitted of abusive sexual conduct, was sentenced to 30 days restriction and hard labor without confinement. Would a civilian court have been more lenient? Does it matter?
Wednesday, October 22, 2014
Sex and the Union Army
![]() |
| Prof. Judith Giesberg |
Lese majeste cases in Thai military courts
Cases involving insults to the monarch (lese majeste) are being referred to the military courts under the current Thai government, according to this report:
[T]he laws of lese majeste, which outlaw insults or criticism of the current monarchy, have been extended in recent years to protect anything connected to the Crown as anxiety over the royal succession mounts.
Last week, two ultra-royalist military officers filed a complaint against Sulak Sivaraksa, 82, over remarks about King Naresuan, who reigned between 1595 and 1605 and is seen as a national hero.
Sivaraksa questioned Naresuan’s victory over a Burmese crown prince in an elephant duel in 1593 at the battle of Nong Sarai.
“Is Naresuan really a hero as they claim?” he reportedly said. “Did anyone of us actually see King Naresuan engaging in an elephant duel?”
Since the military took power in May, all lese majeste cases are being tried by military courts, where there is no possibility of appeal. The offense is punishable by up to 15 years imprisonment and, with cumulative sentencing, offenders can be sentenced to several decades in jail.Exam question: what's wrong with this picture?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




