tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4070126256373578912.post816170162559709068..comments2024-03-20T17:53:33.153-04:00Comments on Global Military Justice Reform: Ft. Hood case reveals limited view of military judge's powerEugene R. Fidellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14694139458443207131noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4070126256373578912.post-88074919626244244702014-07-07T07:37:59.614-04:002014-07-07T07:37:59.614-04:00I don't understand why the defense did not mak...I don't understand why the defense did not make a motion based on United States v. Griffith, or the judge consider he had the power under Griffith if he thought the facts legally insufficient. See United States v. Scaff, 29 M.J. 60 (C.M.A. 1989); United States v. Griffith, 27 M.J. 42 (C.M.A. 1988).<br />The Griffith motion is something I've commented on, blogged on, and advocated for years. In the right case it works.<br />Phil Cavehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14474250926717405497noreply@blogger.com