tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4070126256373578912.post6613206089911974908..comments2024-03-20T17:53:33.153-04:00Comments on Global Military Justice Reform: Flash -- this just in . . .Eugene R. Fidellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14694139458443207131noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4070126256373578912.post-76481057429901624762019-06-13T09:28:26.516-04:002019-06-13T09:28:26.516-04:00If CAAF's history is of any benefit to anyone,...If CAAF's history is of any benefit to anyone, they (unfortunately imho) frequently deny review just so the accused cannot seek certiorari. But, all that means is that the case is now ripe for federal habeas relief.<br /><br />However, there may be a simpler answer based upon the QP - it is pretty fact specific and so they simply may not have wanted to jump into that affray in the context of this case, but issued the Per Curiam as "notice" (or warning) that under different or more facts, the issue isn't dead. Just my 2 cents.Don Rehkopfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00591990643107446160noreply@blogger.com