Sunday, December 17, 2017

Explain this, please

Is there some reason the names of the trial defense counsel are replaced with initials in this November Art. 62, UCMJ decision of the U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals? Oh, and how come the military judge is referred to as "MJ" even though his name is given on page 1?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments are subject to moderation and must be submitted under your real name. Anonymous comments will not be posted (even though the form seems to permit them).